Captain Joe
Captain Joe
Captain Joe

If you want find out more about flying, then you have come to right place !!!
With my videos I´ll try to give you a closer look into the world of aviation !!!
Send in your question and I´ll do my best to include your answer within upcoming videos !!!

Enjoy, and remember : DO YOUR BEST, FORGET THE REST !!!

Wenn ihr mehr über das Fliegen erfahren möchtet, seid ihr hier genau richtig !!!
Mit meinen Videos möchte ich Euch einen besseren Einblick verschaffen in die Welt des Fliegens !!!
Schickt mir Eure Fragen und ich werde mein bestmögliches versuchen die Antwort in die folgenden Videos mit einzubinden !!!

  1. Celestino Pereira

    Celestino Pereira11 시간 전

    Well, yes and no... a plane fly because of the airflow speed trough the wings generates lift. So if you speed the air trough the wings the airplane can fly. For example one Propeller aircraft in theory can generate enough air flow speed to create lift. And a jet engine also can do this, if you put the jet engine in a position that the thrust generate enough airflow and that air go trough the wings then the plane fly. This is just theoric, i don´t know any airplane with the engines in that position or a propeller airplane that can do that. more the helicopter fly without wings, just with a giant propeller :)

  2. Paul Faulkner

    Paul Faulkner11 시간 전

    I live in Chesterfield....

  3. Mitchell Rice

    Mitchell Rice11 시간 전

    Yes the plane can take off, as it is not the wheels driving the plane forward. Rather the thrust is propelling the plane. The wheels will just spin faster and the plane will move forward and eventually take off. This scenario only works if the conveyor is as long as a run way though

  4. ENGİN

    ENGİN11 시간 전

    Waiting wind limits video. Especially tail and head wind limits are limited by what?

  5. BD47

    BD4711 시간 전

    Starlux with the call sign starwalker

  6. Varun Sikka

    Varun Sikka11 시간 전

    Wow, the legacy of portside and starboard still exists.

  7. MusikCassette

    MusikCassette11 시간 전

    would it not save even more fuel to taxi just on the APU?

  8. Kiko Friesen

    Kiko Friesen12 시간 전

    Neat! This sorta reminds me of that episode from Mythbusters where they tried that out. Cool channel by the way!

  9. Александр Стручков

    Александр Стручков12 시간 전

    I know the answer before you asking it. Answer is yes.

  10. Brad Johnson

    Brad Johnson12 시간 전


  11. Mike Palmer

    Mike Palmer12 시간 전

    Excellent video Joe.

  12. Flying Ratbag

    Flying Ratbag12 시간 전

    FO Joe. I did it in 4 years.

  13. Enut Peanut

    Enut Peanut12 시간 전

    no, no, the Pilatus PC-24's yoke isn't a PlayStation controller! It has PC in the name!

  14. Jacob Benosky

    Jacob Benosky12 시간 전

    last time i checked spinning wheels dont generate lift lol.....

  15. fibbo obbif

    fibbo obbif13 시간 전

    I wonder why this cargo plane (or maybe other cargo planes) did not use the nearest runway (in this case 07R) to land...

  16. Bill Green

    Bill Green13 시간 전

    Thrust is against the air and not the ground. If the wheels provided the force to move forward the plane would remain in position.

  17. 1robbond

    1robbond13 시간 전


  18. Carlos H

    Carlos H13 시간 전

    Engines, wheels, belts moving one direction or another, slow or fast... it's all irrelevant. Air over the wings is the only thing that matters.

  19. Benen Sddbekfjj

    Benen Sddbekfjj13 시간 전

    One flies and the other one stays on the ground.

  20. FlightMariner

    FlightMariner13 시간 전

    See this being discussed “again” in one of the GA Facebook groups... seriously. 🙄

  21. The secular humanist

    The secular humanist14 시간 전

    No bcs the plane needs to go fast enough to have enough air flowing over the wings to generate enough lift to take off.

  22. Ian Clare

    Ian Clare14 시간 전

    No, because the airflow over the wings does not match the speed and will not generate any lift.


    LEMMY LEMON14 시간 전

    At least airplanes are getting some exercise after a long quarantine 😂

  24. Luigi Tenneriello

    Luigi Tenneriello14 시간 전

    Well, it can take off... if the belt goes at something like 1000 or 2000 km/h. The belt will move air back, and this generates lift. (The plane will not go very far though)

  25. Jeffry747

    Jeffry74714 시간 전

    Need airflow over the wings to generate lift. You can spin the wheels on the conveyor belt all you want, but if the plane is sitting still, it will not lift off.

  26. Divin Plackattu

    Divin Plackattu14 시간 전

    departures from Boeing and Airbus to runways

  27. Fernando Torres Leiva

    Fernando Torres Leiva14 시간 전

    Thanks for the video. Please what happened to that airplane that landed with the nose wheel twisted. Thanks in advance

  28. Mindaugas Berteska

    Mindaugas Berteska14 시간 전

    no, it can't because engines has to provide trust, and trust provides lift, and if there is no trust, it's imposible to get plane airborne

  29. Josse

    Josse15 시간 전

    The answer is yes as the plane accelerates, using the engines and not the wheels

  30. Avve

    Avve15 시간 전

    It won't take off as theres no airflow towards the plane.

  31. diecicatorce

    diecicatorce15 시간 전

    Now the title goes to Rednose from Norwegian!

  32. Rob DeBiaso

    Rob DeBiaso15 시간 전

    I’m gonna tell my kids this was Paul Rudd....kidding. Awesome content!

  33. Jim Mork

    Jim Mork15 시간 전

    One of the flaws in the airplane design was allowing it to be shut off. That fact was pointed out almost immediately. Some said "Oh, there are times when the crew should be able to shut it off." But the fact it was not running has cost millions and millions spent to not find the plane.

  34. dingoProductionsuk

    dingoProductionsuk15 시간 전

    Your a pilot and you got this wrong?? Come on @captin joe. This was tested 10 years ago and demonstrated the plane will take off. You know a plane gets no forward momentum from the whells it gets it from the engines

  35. Сергей Смирнов

    Сергей Смирнов15 시간 전

    The whole point was that conveyor cant exactly match speed of the wheels. Engines produce trust that pushes plane forward. So wheels need to start spinning. As soon as they start conveyor will match their speed. Buy Thrust still pushing plane forward so the wheels need no spin faster. And this wheels-conveyor accelerations continues to infinity. But infinity speed is not possible so the riddle doesn't make sense. That is what he was trying to tell.

  36. eM Pe

    eM Pe15 시간 전


  37. AeroPlaneSpotter

    AeroPlaneSpotter15 시간 전

    Checklist completed. Check

  38. David Williams

    David Williams15 시간 전

    IFR = I Follow Roads

  39. Kenneth

    Kenneth15 시간 전

    Answer is Yes. Mythbusters did an episode on this. The means of kinetic energy comes from the engines in the form of thrust not from revolving the wheels like in cars.

  40. jaksap

    jaksap16 시간 전

    Two additional questions. Can the converyorbelt motion make the plane airborne without the engines? Does Earth rotation impact the airplane liftoff (e.g. in equatorial regions)?

  41. Marvin Chitwood

    Marvin Chitwood16 시간 전

    Trump just bought the patent !!!

  42. Alex Spencer

    Alex Spencer16 시간 전

    Whoo hooo my birthday.

  43. Givens Tours

    Givens Tours16 시간 전

    Thank's a lot Captain Joe. I've just started with my class for PPL and tou channel is very helpful. Thank you

  44. Sinan Donmez

    Sinan Donmez16 시간 전

    Airspeed causes lift, not the wheelspeed lol

  45. Paul Furniss

    Paul Furniss16 시간 전

    Didn't watch the video, but it's pretty obvious that the plane would take off. The engines push the plane regardless of what it's standing on.

  46. Squawkleo

    Squawkleo16 시간 전

    Yep, that's me. Long sleeves all that round. Small sacrifice though...

  47. Igor Bogdanović

    Igor Bogdanović16 시간 전

    Hmmm... l hope I'm not the only one, who can imagine other stuff going on there, not just sleeping...

  48. Enef56

    Enef5616 시간 전

    An Historian that thinks England is Britain, millions of non English People died defending the UK. England this and England that, yes England is a powerful nation but they wouldn’t have won any wars alone. The Scots, Irish and Welsh along with all our other allies paid a dear price defending this country and shouldn’t be overlooked.

  49. Puer Latinophilus

    Puer Latinophilus16 시간 전

    Where did you come from, where did you go? Where did you come from, Captian Joe?

  50. Elie Meyr kahana

    Elie Meyr kahana16 시간 전

    no !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  51. Elie Meyr kahana

    Elie Meyr kahana17 시간 전

    It s like usa down

  52. Jim Kvasnicka

    Jim Kvasnicka17 시간 전

    No. No lift. In reality, the engines' thrust doesn't care about the conveyor belt, and will propel the plane forward, though, overpinning the wheels on the conveyor belt. However, rather than a conveyor belt, can a 747 theoretically take off in a 184 MPH eadwind (184 mph being the 747's required speed for takeoff), assuming the plane will eventuall have to transition from the 184 mph headwind to some other headwind, crosswind, or tailwind?

  53. Left Flamingo

    Left Flamingo17 시간 전

    Regardless of the wording, the reasoning is wrong. The wheels only spin as a function of the thrust from the engines causing the aircraft to move forward. So for the wheels to spin, there would first be forward movement. As the wheels are free spinning, there is no force preventing the forward motion created by the engine thrust. In Capt. Joe's reasoning, we increase ground speed to take off. This isn't true of course, only an effect. Only airspeed affects the takeoff, and is always greater than the ground speed, save for dead calm conditions. In either case, the plane would take off. This was a subject of a Mythbusters episode many years ago. I was very surprised that Adam and Jamie thought that the moving runway would inhibit the takeoff. It was quite clear that the aircraft would take off.

  54. Dominique Nogueras

    Dominique Nogueras17 시간 전

    The Mythbusters did an experiment about this



    In the Navy gas turbine ship I recall actual call "Engineering casualty, engineering casualty, class B fire 1B GTM, MER1. This is not a drill". Repetitive training does pay off in the actual casualty. It save lives. Prevent further damage and costly repairs.

  56. John Buyers

    John Buyers17 시간 전

    I remember hearing someone describe the take off as sounding “like an angel howling it’s way back to Heaven.”

  57. Simone Basilico

    Simone Basilico17 시간 전

    Minchia zio che sfigato che sei

  58. Bernard Jas

    Bernard Jas17 시간 전

    No, it can't take of. It is nog moving against the wind and therefore there is no lift!

  59. dnxtbillgates

    dnxtbillgates17 시간 전

    Yes, the Smart Fully Automated Routing/Taxi vehicle. The Smart FART.

  60. Elie Meyr kahana

    Elie Meyr kahana17 시간 전

    merci monsieur simplement merci vous êtes dubitatif . merci monsieur

  61. shafin shimanto

    shafin shimanto17 시간 전

    I just completed my high school. Now after watching this video Im too confused what to do should I join a Flying school first or should I get myself admitted in a university and after getting a degree from there then get back to aviation..............

  62. Max Power

    Max Power17 시간 전

    I think the way this instance of the riddle is worded, we have a circular dependency which would cause the ground wheel rotation to accelerate with no upper limit? The ground wheel speed is dependent on the speed of the ground relative to the aircraft. If the aircraft was suspended in a vice or some kind of armature, say, the wheels would rotate normally with the speed of the conveyor belt. Now we introduce a new dependency- the conveyor belt speed is locked to the speed of the wheels, but rotating in the opposite direction. I think the way that is worded means that it would tend to accelerate the speed of the wheels. So if the ground tends to accelerate the wheels, and the wheels accelerate the ground (conveyor belt), I think we have a feedback loop that, as a practical matter, ends in the mechanical destruction of system components. I think this runaway increase in wheel and conveyor belt speed would be triggered by the slightest motion of the wheels relative to the conveyor belt, and might not require the jet to make any meaningful actions at all. It would probably just randomly trigger with the jet sitting on the belt.

  63. CaE

    CaE17 시간 전

    It wont have thrust cause it would sit in the same place so it wouldnt create lift

  64. ThePoisond

    ThePoisond17 시간 전

    Can't be always; he decided not to be a dentist!

  65. oliver ottis

    oliver ottis18 시간 전

    my faforite plane is boeing747

  66. Preetam Baitharu

    Preetam Baitharu18 시간 전

    "What we should buy ?? " Joe : "Product with Decency !!!"

  67. Duane Antor

    Duane Antor18 시간 전

    Of course not. They have a recoil starter where you have to pull a rope.

  68. Bruh

    Bruh18 시간 전

    Boeing is better. More spacious and more comforting

  69. Benedikt

    Benedikt19 시간 전

    Not sure if my solution to this riddle is correct, I would love to see it being discussed in a video: (juristication: Germany/Europe) You are a student pilot on the day of you exam and your examiner waits for you on an other airfield. Your instructor gives you a written flight order to fly to that airfield and back, making it legal for you as a student to fly there alone. What happens if you do not pass your exam? What happens if you pass your exam? [CAUTION spoiler!] . . . . If you fail, your instructor's flight order allows you to fly home. If you pass, you'll need a taxi. Since you passed, you are no longer a flight student and cannot fly with a flight order from "your" instructor. Since issuing a license takes a few days, you are not a licensed pilot either. So if you fail your flight test, you may fly home on your own. If you are good at flying and pass it, you may not fly home. Is this true?

  70. bignards101

    bignards10119 시간 전

    Since the plane doesnt use its wheels to propel itself on takeoff the conveyor is a moot point and doesnt do anything for takeoff

  71. J Pol

    J Pol19 시간 전

    They made a tight left u turn and could have lined up for the runway they took off from. That would have been the quickest route to landing. My question is why would they buy time in the air by passing up that runway and circling in from the opposite direction, just to complete the checklists, when they could have set down sooner? Should a crippled air craft try to stay in the air to complete checklists if they are inline for a much quicker landing? That seems like they are taking a much bigger chance of crashing by staying up! Please clear up this question of landing immediately or staying aloft to complete checklists! I feel they should have landed sooner on the same runway without completing checklists since it was offered to them. Thanks. Great video. Jpol.

  72. danysf 96

    danysf 9619 시간 전

    The next ad KRposts showed me was for a conveyer belt company. thx Captain Joe.

  73. Daniel G

    Daniel G19 시간 전

    I hope the entire flight crew gets a raise.

  74. Sandy Tidwell

    Sandy Tidwell19 시간 전

    I remember when Delta retired the last L1011. It got a water salute before taking off. Very emotional as the L1011s were used a lot ATL to FLL. Back in the day, I was weekly passenger, and it was such a pleasure. My favorite plane ever. The water salute seemed so perfect.

  75. the art of technology

    the art of technology19 시간 전


  76. Just4Fun

    Just4Fun19 시간 전

    Does the digital era has changed how the documents of the aircraft and crew are handled or its till stick to old pen and paper? or maybe a good combo of both🤔

  77. ToxicVaccines ToxicFluoride HIV HOAX

    ToxicVaccines ToxicFluoride HIV HOAX19 시간 전

    What happened to the exes fuel on the plane? I understand pilots must dump in the air the remaining fuel on the fuel tanks before landing to reduce the risk of fire.

  78. Vidur Mathur

    Vidur Mathur19 시간 전

    It’s basically a treadmill for airplanes

  79. Adam T

    Adam T19 시간 전

    "always point skyward", instructions unclear, jacked up the front of my front wheel drive car and now I can't go anywhere